Latest Comments

• That's a joke, son

  Fri Feb 10, 2012
  • Gulf of Tony Hayward. You broke it, you bought it.

• Create Your Own "Up" Clip

  Thu Nov 3, 2011
  • I've tried this several times and haven't been able to get it to work on Facebook. It just posts the whole show. Great feature, wish it worked!

• Alabama sours on hermetically sealed economy

  Tue Nov 22, 2011
  • So true. They didn't think there was an honest cop in Alabama!

• America being America

  Mon Apr 18, 2011
  • Dude. Turn off the TV.

• Austan Goolsbee, whiteboard hero, gamely makes tough sell on taxes

  Thu Dec 9, 2010
  • Boy, aren't you glad he wasn't around during the Clinton years.

• Go ahead & love it: Star Wars subway car

  Wed Jul 14, 2010
  • Things like this remind me of why I LOVE the United States!

• Rachel's amazing walk through the market

  Wed Jul 7, 2010
  • As tall as you are Rachel and with short hair and trousers you may have made less of a disturbance just walking around without the hijab. Stay safe.

• Alvin Greene gets funny website, courts trouble deep

  Wed Jun 30, 2010
  • I agree. I think they're taking advantage of someone who isn't really capable of understanding what is happening. I don't know how much money they offered him to do it (and by they, I of course mean the Republican Party of South Carolina) but it's appalling.

• Best. Graph. Ever. (Modified)

  Thu Mar 4, 2010
  • @tkwelge, this graph does not show a 1.4 trillion dollar deficit, it shows the effect on the budget. In other words, the Bush tax cuts (1st round) cost 1.4 trillion dollars in revenue.

• Best. Graph. Ever. (Modified)

  Thu Mar 4, 2010
  • Uh...I'm not sure what you mean by that. The only reason two have impact on the "budget" and the other is an impact on the "deficit" is because of what the graph is trying to represent. If your budget is $2000 a month and you spend $4000 a month, you have a budget deficit.